Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Alan L Tyree <alanty...@gmail.com> writes: > >> When positioned in footnote text, the function jumps back *to the >> beginning* of the footnote reference. It would be more convenient to >> jump to the end of the reference since that is where the author is >> likely to pick up typing the text. > > It was done this way because, if point at the end of the reference, you > cannot use C-c C-c another time to jump back to the definition. > > Also, if the buffer ends with the footnote reference, there is no such > place. So, sometimes, you will move after the reference, and other > times, it will be on its last character. > > I'm not sure which behaviour is the less annoying. > > > Regards,
OK, I can see that. For my own use, the suggested behaviour would be better and the two situations you mention would only be a very occasional annoyance. The current behaviour has annoyed me 250 times so far in the one document :-). But I see your point -- it would be a compromise either way. Thanks for the answer. Cheers, Alan -- Alan L Tyree http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan Tel: 04 2748 6206 sip:172...@iptel.org
