Hi Xue, Eric and Dieter, die...@duenenhof-wilhelm.de (H. Dieter Wilhelm) writes:
> (I would avoid the ambiguous expression "column two" since it is a > relative specification) alternatively > > The TWO REFERENCES expand to a field range from the row above the > current row, starting with two columns to the left up to the current > column. Yes... but this is a bit long. I finally used this: @@-1$-2..@@-1 @r{in the first row up, 3 fields from 2 columns on the left} Implicitely, the sentence ends with "up to the current one", which I think can be assumed to be obvious here. Let me know if you think this is still confusing. Best, -- Bastien