Hi Xue, Eric and Dieter,
[email protected] (H. Dieter Wilhelm) writes:
> (I would avoid the ambiguous expression "column two" since it is a
> relative specification) alternatively
>
> The TWO REFERENCES expand to a field range from the row above the
> current row, starting with two columns to the left up to the current
> column.
Yes... but this is a bit long.
I finally used this:
@@-1$-2..@@-1 @r{in the first row up, 3 fields from 2 columns on the left}
Implicitely, the sentence ends with "up to the current one", which I
think can be assumed to be obvious here.
Let me know if you think this is still confusing.
Best,
--
Bastien