Hi Carsten, thanks a lot for the very clear explanations.
Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: > The difference is only the repeated concatenation operation, and not the > recompilation. I always thought that this would work differently, and that > is why a lot of regexps get constructed and then stored in variables or > constants. Of course this is also a good practice for readable and > maintainable code, but the impact on efficiency is not as big as I used to > think. So when I saw Christoher's initial patch, I thought a function to > create > org-ooutline-regexp-bol would be a large burden in speed - but it now seems > that it would only be a minor impact. That was my assumption too... hence my reaction to Christopher's patch. It now makes sense -- I'll ask for confirmation on the emacs-devel as suggested by Christopher. > Still, I think making a local variable in buffers with > org-struct-mode is also a good way to get the functionality > Christopher wants. Mh... here I'm not sure to understand what you suggest. Isn't the whole point of Christopher's patch to rely on a buffer local value of org-outline-regexp? I surely miss something. Thanks! -- Bastien
