Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > >>> This syntax is wrong anyway. It should be: >>> >>> #+attr_latex: :width "5cm" >>> >>> or >>> >>> #+attr_latex: :width 5cm >> >> From the tests I made on images, with the Beamer back-end, those did not >> work. >> It had to be: >> >> #+ATTR_LaTeX: :options "width=5cm" >> >> Right? > > Correct. :width is for tables.
Thanks. For my information (and not only for me, I guess), is there a fundamental reason (I guess yes) why width is a first-class parameter for tables and an option among others for images? Looking from a 50 ft perspective, I would even imagine the opposite: images will have to be scales in almost all cases (that is: have their image attribute set), while tables will often take the space they need to. Is there a reason why images can't have their own attributes as well? I would find that much, much more easy to apply, if we don't have to write the same "functional" request in two different manners, depending on the context. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban