Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes: > Does this allow blank lines to separate paragraphs in inline footnote > definitions?
No. Inline definitions stay inlined and as such, cannot contain blank lines. My proposal is only about full footnote definitions. > If so, it sounds very good. > > I presume we can still do > > === > 1) a > > b. > > 1) c > === Yes, the limitation is only about two consecutive lists. In this case, they are not consecutive. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
