Hello,
On 25 February 2013 13:40, Subhan Tindall <subhan.tind...@rentrakmail.com>wrote:
> There are 4 different ref commands, all with slightly syntactic
> requirements and outputs when compiled using makeinfo. I for one use
> @pxref{} a lot, and it has different requirements for placement than
> @ref or @xref (namely those two MUST have a . or , following the end
> of the ref)
>
Not entirely true, @ref{} will add a period after the end of the reference
in the info output
if no period or comma present, @xref{} needs a comma or period. @pxref{}
can be
followed by a period, comma or right parenthesis, otherwise the info output
will include
a period as well.
So all three must have some sort of punctuation (or paren) following them
to ensure that
the references are clearly delimited.
Regards,
> 8.1 Different Cross Reference Commands
> There are four different cross reference commands:
> @xref Used to start a sentence in the printed manual saying ‘See . . .
> ’ or an Info
> cross-reference saying ‘*Note name : node.’.
> @ref Used within or, more often, at the end of a sentence; same as
> @xref for Info;
> produces just the reference in the printed manual without a preceding
> ‘See’.
> @pxref Used within parentheses to make a reference that suits both an
> Info file and a
> printed book. Starts with a lower case ‘see’ within the
> printed manual. (‘p’ is
> for ‘parenthesis’.)
> @inforef Used to make a reference to an Info file for which there is
> no printed manual.
>
> (from the Texinfo manual)
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Jonathan Leech-Pepin
> <jonathan.leechpe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello Tom,
> >
> > On 25 February 2013 12:52, Thomas S. Dye <t...@tsdye.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Aloha all,
> >>
> >> IIUC, there is currently no support for @pxref{} in the texinfo
> >> exporter. This is a texinfo @-command that does one thing in the info
> >> output and another in the LaTeX output.
> >
> >
> > Ultimately there is actually no real difference between "see @ref{}"
> > and "@pxref{}". I just checked using the first @pxref{} in org.texi
> > (Under Activation).
> >
> > In org.texi it is shown as (@pxref{Conflicts}), in org.html it
> > becomes: (see <a href="#Conflicts">Conflicts</a>) while in the info
> > file (org) it is shown as (*note Conflicts::).
> >
> > Opening the info file in Info (C-u C-h i <path to info file>), *node
> > Conflicts:: becomes "see Conflicts". Adding "see" manually
> > before *note does not change the output. The same is the case for
> > @xref{}. @xref{} adds "See" before the link in html/LaTeX, and
> > uses *Note in the info document; "See [[link]]" produces the same See in
> > html/LaTeX, and creates "See *note" in the info file (which is
> > inserted as "See <link>" in Emacs Info.
> >
> > Yes the output is different if looking at the info file directly,
> > however when viewing it withing Emacs the text is consistent.
> >
> > I didn't implement support for @xref{} or @pxref{} in the texinfo
> > exporter, because I could not find a way to reliably determine the
> > context so as to use the right type of link in the texi file.
> >
> > Using occur there were already 47 cases in org.texi where "[Ss]ee
> > @ref" was used rather than the stylistically appropriate @pxref/@xref.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jon
> >
> >>
> >> My idea is to create a custom link type, something like this:
> >>
> >> (org-add-link-type
> >> "pxref" nil
> >> (lambda (path desc format)
> >> (cond
> >> ((eq format 'html)
> >> (format "<span class=\"pxref\">%s</span>" path))
> >> ((eq format 'latex)
> >> (format "\\ref{%s}" path))
> >> ((eq format 'texinfo)
> >> (format "@pxref{%s,%s}" path desc)))))
> >>
> >> I haven't tested this, but it should export approximately correctly and
> >> I'm confident I can get the export part working.
> >>
> >> What I can't figure out is how to have Org recognize that a link like
> >> this:
> >>
> >> [[pxref:Internal link]]
> >>
> >> is really an internal link, rather than an external link. I'd like to
> >> be able to click on this and end up at <<Internal link>> in the Org
> >> buffer.
> >>
> >> Is this possible? If so, can you point me to a solution?
> >>
> >>
> >> All the best,
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> --
> >> T.S. Dye & Colleagues, Archaeologists
> >> 735 Bishop St, Suite 315, Honolulu, HI 96813
> >> Tel: 808-529-0866, Fax: 808-529-0884
> >> http://www.tsdye.com
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Subhan Michael Tindall | Software Developer
> | s...@rentrakmail.com
> RENTRAK | www.rentrak.com | NASDAQ: RENT
>
