Bastien-
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 07:14:07PM +0100, Bastien wrote:
> Done. You can now use HTML_HEAD instead of HTML_STYLE.
>
> Some variables were also renamed, check the details here:
> http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/commit/?id=2752ef
In trying to migrate these changes to the slide exporters, i noticed
some confusion w/ the migration of html-style vs. html-style-extra:
- (:html-style nil nil org-html-style)
- (:html-style-extra "HTML_STYLE" nil org-html-style-extra newline)
- (:html-style-include-default nil nil org-html-style-include-default)
- (:html-style-include-scripts nil nil org-html-style-include-scripts)
+ (:html-head "HTML_HEAD" nil org-html-head newline)
+ (:html-style-include-default nil nil org-html-head-include-default-style)
+ (:html-head-include-scripts nil nil org-html-head-include-scripts)
...
- exp-plist :html-style-extra
- (concat (or (plist-get exp-plist :html-style-extra) "")
+ exp-plist :html-head-extra
+ (concat (or (plist-get exp-plist :html-head-extra) "")
"\n"
style)))))
Specifically,
- :html-style was renamed to :html-head (ok), but the
in-buffer property HTML_HEAD was added to this export
property.
- :html-style-extra was (which was associated w/t the
in-buffer property HTML_STYLE) was removed from the export
prop list (but is referenced later in the code.
- `org-html-head-extra' is mentioned in a doc string but never
defined.
I think this is a bug/typo. Wouldn't the following be closer to a
straight renaming:
(:html-head nil nil org-html-head newline)
(:html-head-extra HTML_HEAD nil org-html-head-extra newline)
or should {org-,:}html-head-extra be dropped entirely?
Also, shouldn't :html-style-include-default be
:html-head-include-default?
rick
