Glenn Morris <r...@gnu.org> writes: >> I assumed it was okay to fix bugs after the last pretest, is it so? > > No, it is not ok, and I don't know why you would think it is.
I missed the distinction between "pretest" and "release candidate". > The reason for this policy is (obviously) to prevent inadvertently > introducing mistakes. This seems to be exactly what has bitten us in > this case, where your patch just reverts the change from > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-diffs/2013-02/msg00058.html > > Was that fixing a regression? I doubt it. I find it hard to draw a clear line between regressions and bugs, especially since Org 7.9.x versions are way behind the current Org master branch. > Please apply the first patch as soon as possible. Done. > The second includes stuff like deleting comments, declaring functions, > and changing autoload for "org-autoload". No, you may not apply this. > > If there were any fixes in there for important regression bugs against > Emacs 24.2, please make a separate patch with just those items. Those are not critical regressions, so I won't apply them. -- Bastien
