Eric Schulte writes: > I prefer leaving the hash with the results, as it is the results which > are "hashed". Also, same input does not always guarantee same output, > e.g., > > #+begin_src sh > date > #+end_src
That's not what I'm seeing, but I may be missing something again. The hash is for the parameters of the call, not the result. If I'm editing the result, Babel still marks the cache valid and does not re-compute it. It does re-compute if I change the parameters explicitly or implicitly, even if the result will not change. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Wavetables for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldUserWavetables
