Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> writes: > Eric Schulte writes: >> From re-looking at Achim's previous noweb example, it seems that we >> currently do *not* include the values of noweb expansions in code block >> hash calculations, I think this is a bug which should be fixed. > > It could very well have been a conscious decision, given that this can > lead to exponential complexity (I guess it's too late to ask Dan Davison > about that). That's why I said we need to clarify what we want this to > do first and then see how we implement it. >
I do think that the noweb expanded body should be used in code block hashing. This is not very different from the expansion of included :var header arguments before hashing takes place. Cheers, > > > Regards, > Achim. -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
