Buddy Butterfly <buddy.butter...@web.de> writes:

> I still feel the lack of the support for all tj properties a
> major drawback.
>
> @Christian: Did you work on something like the prefix proposal below?
> This would be real cool as we could then just use any property we would
> like.

As far as I know Yann's patches improved this situation, but as far as I
know most of the tj properties are supported anyway. Can you specify
which properties are missing? It should be easy to add them in many
cases.

Thanks
Christian

-- 
Christian Egli
Swiss Library for the Blind, Visually Impaired and Print Disabled
Grubenstrasse 12, CH-8045 Zürich, Switzerland


Reply via email to