Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes: Hi Samuel, > IIUC, I don't think this is related. The idea is not to edit source > code in Org buffers, and it is not to use a Navi buffer or to do > navigation. > > The idea is to be in my-lisp.el, and do C-c ', and get to a canonical > entry in my-org.org, then do C-c ' again and get back to my-lisp.el. > > The navi buffer seems like it wouldn't do that.
that sounds like a different idea. I have heard about programming environments that keep comments and source-code in two different (but sync'd) files to minimize distraction from the source code - maybe a possible use case for your idea? -- cheers, Thorsten
