Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes: > I need to think harder about this and to get more feedback, because > the new behavior seems the correct one to me. Also, it is in sync > with the docstring of `org-insert-heading-respect-content': > > Non-nil means insert new headings after the current subtree. When > nil, the new heading is created directly after the current line. > ^^^^^ > > This is about *inserting* a new heading, not about turning the current > line into a heading (which is fine to have when there is no heading > above, of course.) Also, reverting to the old behavior would move > S-M-RET closer to C-c *. > > Let's see if other users find the current behavior annoying, and let > me know how annoying it is to you!
OK. If this is working as designed I'm fine with that. I'll just change my habits :) I actually didn't read the docstring was just basing it on previous behaviour (which may have been incorrect). Thanks, Bernt
