Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes: > Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Then why do you suggest to drop the idea (for now)? > > Because IIUC, the time-stamps would not be ignored here > > * Task > <2013-04-14 dim.> > <2013-04-16 dim.> > > because > > <2013-04-14 dim.> > <2013-04-16 dim.> > > is a paragraph. (The agenda takes both time-stamps into > account in a simple `org-agenda-list'.) If we can remove > the one-time-stamp only case, but not the case with two, > it is too confusing IMHO.
Correct. > What do you think? We can widen the definition of `standalone': a standalone timestamp is a timestamp belonging to a paragraph that contains only timestamps objects. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
