Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi, > > I've been wanting to add the ability to post-process the results of a > code block for some time, and some recent threads (e.g., [1] and [2]) > could both have benefited from post-processing of code block output.
[...] > Does this new header argument seem useful? Any suggestions for better > syntax which don't add too much conceptual or code complexity? Very useful indeed! I don't have a chance to try this out properly now but I know of several previous org files where this would have been very useful. One question: can one have a sequence of forward chained blocks with length > 2? Thanks, eric -- : Eric S Fraga, GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D : in Emacs 24.3.50.1 and Org release_7.9.3f-1199-g3a0e55
