Michael Brand <michael.ch.br...@gmail.com> writes: > The ERT you added for this makes me wonder again: What is the status > of #+NAME for tables? Initiated by a discussion on the list some time > ago I thought I could and would better migrate all my #+TBLNAME > to #+NAME but since it still does not work for remote references like > this > > #+TBLNAME: table > | 42 | > > | 42 | > #+TBLFM: $1 = remote(table, @1$1) > > I thought I did not understand the development of #+NAME. Are remote > references supposed to work also with #+NAME for tables?
NAME should be a drop-in replacement for TBLNAME[fn:1]. If it doesn't work for remote references in tables, then "org-table.el" must be updated. I'll have a look at it later, unless Someone beats me to it. Regards, [fn:1] In fact, it should also be a replacement for DATA, LABEL, RESNAME, SOURCE, and SRCNAME. -- Nicolas Goaziou
