Hi Bastien, Bastien wrote: > Ben Finney <ben+em...@benfinney.id.au> writes: >>> It bothers me mostly for the guide, where I did spend a lot of time to >>> make it compact, and now something like one fifth of it is license >>> text. We may actually consider to re-release the guide under a >>> different license. >> >> Please use this as an opportunity to seriously consider relicensing the >> entire work (programs, documentation, etc.) of Org-mode under the same >> license: the GNU GPL. It does not have the special problems of the FDL, >> and having the whole work under the same license terms makes it simpler >> and clearer. > > Well, relicensing the Org compact guide under GNU GPL is definitely > feasible, but relicensing the Org manual is (sadly) not. Let's take > the feasible step first?
FMI, why is GNU GPL not applicable to the manual? Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
