-> Michael Brand writes: [...]
> Let me suggest one more variant. No row numbers, uses the fact that > the formula for $3 is not evaluated in the header and it circumvents > the bug: > | | WP | Days | Arrival Date | > | | | | <2013-06-05 Wed> | > |---+----+------+------------------| > | | 1 | 4 | <2013-06-09 Sun> | > | | - | 2 | <2013-06-11 Tue> | > | | 2 | 4 | <2013-06-15 Sat> | > | | - | 2 | <2013-06-17 Mon> | > | | 3 | 1 | <2013-06-18 Tue> | > | | 4 | 2 | <2013-06-20 Thu> | > | | 5 | 1 | <2013-06-21 Fri> | > | | - | 2 | <2013-06-23 Sun> | > | | 6 | 1 | <2013-06-24 Mon> | > | | 7 | 2 | <2013-06-26 Wed> | > | | - | 1 | <2013-06-27 Thu> | > | | 8 | 1 | <2013-06-28 Fri> | > | | 9 | 1 | <2013-06-29 Sat> | > | | - | 3 | <2013-07-02 Tue> | > | | 10 | 3 | <2013-07-05 Fri> | > | | - | 1 | <2013-07-06 Sat> | > | | 11 | 2 | <2013-07-08 Mon> | > |---+----+------+------------------| > | | | 33 | <2013-07-08 Mon> | > #+TBLFM: $4 = @-1 + $3 :: @>$3 = vsum(@I..@II) :: @>$4 = @-1 That's a very nice variant and works well. Thanks. BTW, what is the difference between `C-u C-c C-c' and `C-u C-*'? I thought they're doing the same thing. > Michael cheers -- -dude Too brief? Here's why! http://emailcharter.org