John Hendy <jw.he...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Vincent Beffara <vbeff...@ens-lyon.fr> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> I tracked down an error about \iint already being defined to a clash >>> between wasysym and amsmath. I brought in amsmath, but it appears that >>> wasysym is an Org LaTeX export default package. >> >> Just put this in the LaTeX header before you load amsmath: >> >> \usepackage{savesym} >> \savesymbol{iint} >> \savesymbol{iiint} >> > > Does this savewasysym's definition if iint instead of amsmath's? In > the case that I actually use \iint (super unlikely, but not > impossible), which package's is preferred? >
The wasysym docs say that there should be no conflict, but that seems to be wrong: ISTR multiple instances of this conflict. If you prefer the amsmath integral signs over the wasysym ones, then probably the best thing to do is to load wasysym with the ``nointegrals'' option: \usepackage[nointegrals]{wasysym} This can be done permanently by customizing org-latex-default-packages-alist and adding the option to the wasysym entry. -- Nick