Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes: > Thorsten Jolitz <tjol...@gmail.com> writes: > >> but there is no >> >> ,---------------------- >> | \usepackage{listings} >> `---------------------- > > This is a feature to my understanding.
mmhh ... I would rather say that the defaults can be as simple as possible (or desired), but should result in reasonable output without any user interaction. But without adding a \usepackage{listings} or modifying the variables you mention the LaTeX output is unusable in this case. > Several packagess can format, and I for instance prefer pygments if I > need code formatting. Then the default should be loading one of them rather than using package macros in the exported LaTeX sources without loading a package that contains those macros. > You could add listings to your packages list, either > org-latex-packages-alist or even org-latex-default-packages-alist, if > you really want to. > > You could probably also write a clever filter to load a package if it > is missing. I could, and thanks for the tips, but I still think this can be considered a bug (if I'm not the only one having the problem). -- cheers, Thorsten