Hello,
Bastien wrote:
> Bastien <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> I see no harm in supporting more flexibility where we can.
>
> I should add that Org is a way for many LaTeX newbies to discover LaTeX,
> supporting alphabetical lists in LaTeX (and other backend) goes into this
> direction IMO.
Speaking of lists, when I showed Org mode this week-end to some "hard LaTeX
guy", when he saw that we could choose between "-", "+" and "*" for itemized
lists and between "1." and "1)" for enumerated lists (whichever the depth
level), he suggested (for enumerated lists) that:
- 2nd level items should be:
(a) ...
(b) ...
(c) ...
(d) ...
- 3rd level items should be:
i. ...
ii. ...
iii. ...
iv. ...
or:
i. ...
ii. ...
iii. ...
iv. ...
- 4th level items should be:
A. ...
B. ...
C. ...
D. ...
It is what is implemented (following typographical rules?) for both French and
English (at least) in LaTeX. See:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
\documentclass[english,french]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{babel}
%
\begin{document}
\newcommand{\test}{%
\begin{enumerate}
\item
\begin{enumerate}
\item
\begin{enumerate}
\item
\begin{enumerate}
\item
\item
\item
\item
\end{enumerate}
\item
\item
\item
\end{enumerate}
\item
\item
\item
\end{enumerate}
\item
\item
\item
\end{enumerate}
}
\test{}
\selectlanguage{english}
\test{}
\end{document}
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Dunno what you think about that, dunno if that's feasible and easy... But
wanted to share with you his point of view...
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
