Hello, Bastien wrote: > Bastien <b...@altern.org> writes: > >> I see no harm in supporting more flexibility where we can. > > I should add that Org is a way for many LaTeX newbies to discover LaTeX, > supporting alphabetical lists in LaTeX (and other backend) goes into this > direction IMO.
Speaking of lists, when I showed Org mode this week-end to some "hard LaTeX guy", when he saw that we could choose between "-", "+" and "*" for itemized lists and between "1." and "1)" for enumerated lists (whichever the depth level), he suggested (for enumerated lists) that: - 2nd level items should be: (a) ... (b) ... (c) ... (d) ... - 3rd level items should be: i. ... ii. ... iii. ... iv. ... or: i. ... ii. ... iii. ... iv. ... - 4th level items should be: A. ... B. ... C. ... D. ... It is what is implemented (following typographical rules?) for both French and English (at least) in LaTeX. See: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- \documentclass[english,french]{article} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{babel} % \begin{document} \newcommand{\test}{% \begin{enumerate} \item \begin{enumerate} \item \begin{enumerate} \item \begin{enumerate} \item \item \item \item \end{enumerate} \item \item \item \end{enumerate} \item \item \item \end{enumerate} \item \item \item \end{enumerate} } \test{} \selectlanguage{english} \test{} \end{document} --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Dunno what you think about that, dunno if that's feasible and easy... But wanted to share with you his point of view... Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban