Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hello, > > Andreas Leha <andreas.l...@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes: > >> In that case, I guess some confusion might come from LaTeX, for example, >> where also the newline is ignored by the comment, s.t. in LaTeX >> ,---- >> | Some text >> | % comment >> | Some other text >> `---- >> is interpreted as >> ,---- >> | Some text >> | Some other text >> `---- > > Comparing Org and LaTeX is like comparing apples and oranges: it can > only lead to false assumptions and cloud thinking. > Agreed. I just wanted to mention one possible source of such false assumptions. >> IMO, there is no 'feature' in the 'paragraph breaking' comments in >> org. But I understand that it is quite hard to change that behaviour. > > Just to be clear. I didn't talk about a "feature". I merely described > the state of affairs, and added that, albeit not perfect, it seemed good > enough to me. I hope I did not offend you with that paragraph. I did not want to say that you called it a feature. If was merely a summary of the thread, as I understood it. I actually never ran into the problem myself, as I do not comment too much in my org files. So I am in the 'good enough' group as well. Regards, Andreas
