Nicolas Girard <girard.nico...@gmail.com> writes: >> `org-babel-exp-non-block-elements' and `org-babel-exp-process-buffer' >> could probably check if code still exists before trying to remove (and >> replace) it. >> > > Yeah, I don't know how much work it would represent but it seems much > more appropriate that my hack-ish solution.
It might be tricky to set up. I'm not even sure Babel is meant for these cases (where evaluating code removes its source). Another possibility is to have a "side-effect only" behaviour for export where code block is not removed nor replaced. ":exports none" could be a candidate for this. Maybe Eric Schulte has an opinion on it. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
