On 9.9.2013, at 10:33, "Sebastien Vauban" <sva-n...@mygooglest.com> wrote:
> Hi Carsten, > > Carsten Dominik wrote: >> On 9.9.2013, at 10:23, Sebastien Vauban <sva-n...@mygooglest.com> wrote: >>> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>>> On 9.9.2013, at 10:11, "Sebastien Vauban" <sva-n...@mygooglest.com> wrote: >>>>> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>>>>>> - not possible anymore to use C-a or C-e in code blocks to select >>>>>>> regions; not reported yet, though I reported similar problems with >>>>>>> C-arrows (apparently due to a change which is now officially part of >>>>>>> 8.1). IMO, that renders editing of code block in the original buffer >>>>>>> much more annoying. >>>>> >>>>> Regarding C-down, is it possible to get it back working for selecting >>>>> parts of code? >>>>> >>>>> In the video captured at http://screencast.com/t/1WjWohviyjE, we see that >>>>> we can move from an heading to the next with C-down (which is a nice >>>>> extra addition to the already existing speed commands), but also select >>>>> subelements in a region (paragraphs or list items). >>>>> >>>>> Though, in the code block, C-down still looses the region... >>>> >>>> is this about loosing the active mark, or about the effect that C-down now >>>> jumps elements, not paragraphs? >>> >>> In fact, both... If we wanna still allow nice editing of code blocks, >>> without forcing the users to use the indirect buffer, one must be able to >>> quickly select, let's say a defvar, and copy it somewhere else; like we >>> would do in the programming mode buffer (and like we did in the Org buffer, >>> up to the change with C-down). >> >> So maybe you just want to bing C-down to forward-paragraph again? > > This is a possibility, yes, but it completely defeats the nice `C-down' add-on > (when outside of code block), and I guess I won't be the only one with that > "problem". > > Of course, the nicest would be to have both: the current `C-down' for text, > and the "programmatic" behavior when _in code blocks_. Maybe, that's not > possible, though... This might be difficult, but not impossible. I think this might be a question for Nicolas to answer? - Carsten > > Best regards, > Seb > > -- > Sebastien Vauban > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
