> > Maybe I'm missing the point of the :missing header, but I find it > easier and clearer to include the datafile missing command in the > gnuplot code block. I don't really see a need for the :missing > header. Maybe the need stems from wanting to be able to use different > plotting packages to plot the same org table data, but it's not clear > to me. >
I agree that it is easier and more clear to include "set datafile missing..." in the body of a gnuplot code block. I *do* think that the :missing header argument has value specifically as a way to replace missing values in the original table data. I've changed the behavior of the :missing header argument so that it *only* replaces missing values in table data and does not add a "set datafile missing..." line to the code block. Cheers, -- Eric Schulte https://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte PGP: 0x614CA05D
