Hi, Suvayu Ali <[email protected]> writes:
> * TODO Subject <timestamp> :emacs_ver:org_ver:org_module:
...
> Emacs version ends up as a tag:
>
> * TODO ..... :24.3:
Or, if I add an Org version:
* TODO ..... :24.3:8.0.3:
These bare numbers seem a bit too anonymous to me. I think it's
unlikely that Org will reach versions in the 20's anytime soon so
collision won't happen for a while but eventually (hackers willing!) it
will.
So, I suggest simply qualifying the versions like:
* TODO ..... :emacs_24.3:org_8.0.3:
I can also see a desire to list other software and their versions that
might be implicated in the bug being reported. Listing their bare
versions as tags is, I think, obviously no good. They could just
include this info in an ad-hoc manner in the body of their report, but
maybe it would be good to define a property to explicitly list them
following the same <package>_<version> pattern of the tags.
* TODO ..... :emacs_24.3:org_8.0.3:
:PROPERTIES:
:IMPLICATED_SOFTWARE: texlive_2012.20120611-5 beamer_3.10-2
BTW, I think an issue tracker in Org is very interesting. I look
forward to seeing how it evolves.
-Brett.
pgp6kwuMSCpiV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
