Hi Nicolas, 2013ko urriak 31an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen:
[...] > Moreover, your proposal, IMO, is not well-enough defined. You merely add > a free-form string and call it "parameters". Parameters for what? Which > syntax: a plist, switches? I think a plist would work fine, indeed. > Why cannot some parameters fit into other affiliated keywords > (e.g. HEADER)? Very interesting. I did not realize that #+header: could apply to elements other than babel blocks. (Babel blocks are all that is documented in the manual, for example.) But a quick experiment shows that they can. I think #+header with a plist can accomplish all of what I wanted. So, if this is a reliable component of org syntax, I will focus on documenting it in the manual. If you like, I will also remove the references to block parameters on worg (or you can do it if you’d rather, since I think you originally wrote the syntax document). Thanks, -- Aaron Ecay