Hi Achim On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> wrote: > I've fixed the failing test since it wasn't checking hline expressions > and hence should not have relied on undocumented behaviour in the first > place.
I agree that testing of "LHS hline ref range" and testing of something else (in this case "comparison") at the same time in the same ert-deftest has also disadvantages. But why did you only remove test coverage of "LHS hline ref range" instead of move it into a new ert-deftest? Michael
