Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes: > nil might be a safer default?
This small feature would not be easily discovered if this option is turned to nil, so I'd say `t' makes sense here. But I don't feel strongly about this. -- Bastien
Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes: > nil might be a safer default?
This small feature would not be easily discovered if this option is turned to nil, so I'd say `t' makes sense here. But I don't feel strongly about this. -- Bastien