Hi Rasmus, ras...@gmx.us writes:
[...] > 3. When studying the KOMA manual to answer James' second question I > came across the komavar title which is currently not supported. I > have added support for a separate SUBJECT keyword. The heuristic > is something like this (i) if title and subject are be truthful to > the name no matter what, (ii) if only title or subject is said let > title be subject if org-koma-letter-title-is-subject-maybe is t > otherwise be truthful to name. Thank you for implementing this feature. I already missed it. [...] > In 3. I would personally like to set > org-koma-letter-title-is-subject-maybe to nil by defaults, but this > would break backwards comparability for title keywords. I would like to encourage you to do so, even if it breaks backward compatibility. Since Koma Letter supports Title and Subject, Title should be title and Subject should be subject by default. Everything else could drive users crazy. I've been using Koma Letter for many years for various purposes. Title without subject makes sense, for instance, when writing press releases and certificates. Best regards -- Michael Strey http://www.strey.biz
