Eric Schulte writes: > In that thread we agreed that the expansion of no-web references > *should* be included in code blocks for hashing, but no-one has had the > time to implement this.
I think we may have discussed this before, but if you make the hashes dependent on the possibly recursive noweb expansions this would require that all expansions be re-computed all the time or you would need to discern which of the expansions are "pure" (i.e. depend only on their arguments, functional-style), which have session semantics and which of the ones that have session semantics should possibly not be re-evaluated. I'm not sure that opening this can of worms is worth the trouble. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptation for Waldorf rackAttack V1.04R1: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada
