Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: [...]
> I sometimes use this feature, too. But, admittedly, it is a hack. I guess it depends on the definition of /hack/... I think of it as a feature of lists in LaTeX. Whether this is view extends to org is of course open to debate. [...] > Unfortunately, I can't see how to not break your documents if we fix the > problem. If this is considered a problem, and you intend to fix it, then there is no way to avoid causing me difficulties. Although I would obviously prefer to keep the status quo, as I find this "feature" convenient, please don't let the inconvenience to me stop you fixing this. It won't take me that long to fix. >> In fact, I had started preparing an email to ask the check lists make >> use of this feature to make these lists look nicer when exported to >> LaTeX. For instance, if we have [...] > This is orthogonal to the issue at hand. It is indeed. Apologies for conflating the two. > The problem is not the checkbox but what comes after. I am not sure what you mean here? > IOW, this feature can be implemented with or > without fixing the bug above (also, a filter can do the job). Yes, I appreciate this. A filter is likely what I will end up using. Today I simply edited the LaTeX as I needed to get a document of actions etc. out to a bunch of people quickly. Thanks for your quick response and please do change the handling of []s if you think it would be for the org community's benefit. -- : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.3.50.1, Org release_8.2.5d-479-g8694aa
