Hello Bastien and Thomas, Bastien wrote: > thanks for starting this list. > > t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > >> C-c ! Creating timestamps >> C-c . Creating timestamps >> C-c # Checkboxes >> C-c ' Editing and debugging formulas, literal examples, include files, >> editing source code, cooperation >> C-c , Priorities >> C-c ; Comment lines >> C-c ? Editing and debugging formulas >> C-c @ Structure editing >> C-c ^ Structure editing, plain lists, built-in table editor >> C-c ` Built-in table editor >> C-c ~ Cooperation > > (There is also C-c : (to add QUOTE) but doomed to disappear anyway.)
What about `C-c {' and such in the tables? > I think most of these keybindings could migrate to a C-c C- version. > > For example: > > C-c # Checkboxes > > would be > > C-c C-# Checkboxes > > this would work for all of them except C-c ^ beause C-c C-^ is > already bound to org-up-element. Maybe it can move to C-c M-^ > instead (but that's one of the keybindings that is deeply into > my memory.) So is it for me. As half of the above mentioned key bindings -- the other half, I don't know/use it. > How would everyone feel about moving those keybindings to comply > more closely with Emacs coding recommendations? I guess it's better to comply to the Emacs guidelines. That change will allow us to wake up our neurons and fight against Alzheimer. So, let's do it. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban