Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes:
>> If you're fine with this, I'll raise the topic on both emacs-devel >> and this list. > > I suggested this idea because I thought it was a good one. The very fact > that we're still discussing it proves that it isn't as obvious as > I initially thought. That's fine with me. Let me state it clearly: I'm not against including ox-koma-letter.el in Org's core (then in Emacs), I actually think it is a good addition (once documented, that is.) My suggestion is to ask Emacs maintainers about the general policy regarding new Org/Emacs exporters. Chances are that they will blindly trust us, which I'm fine with. If they have a different opinion, it's better to hear it now than when we do the merge. Also remember I *removed* some exporters and other files from Org's core when releasing 8.0, because I wanted to draw a clearer line: the current rule is "If an Org feature relies on something that is not part of Emacs or not part of a standard GNU system, don't include it into core." That's why ox-freemind.el and org-mew.el new lives in contrib/, for example. For those features, GNU ELPA or some other packages archive (I'm not insisting on Org ELPA) is a the way to go IMO. But let's not revisit this, it's a separate issue. -- Bastien
