Samuel Wales wrote: >> No. This has been raised previously and there was a consensus that it >> is often desirable for code in a COMMENT section to be evaluated on >> export. Personally I often stuff code blocks into COMMENT sections >> which I want run as part of my publishing process (e.g., to create >> resources used in the exported document). > > i won't go against consensus, but to me the expectation is that it > acts just like commented lines. > > for your use case, could you use a section marked noexport or > org-export-with-tasks? i would use the latter.
I was thinking as well that this had been discussed previously, and that the decision had been: - COMMENT is equivalent to "noexport" and "noeval", i.e. no code blocks are run - "noexport" just does that: no export, but code blocks can be run. But I don't find any evidence of this. I must have misunderstood. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
