Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > You call it extreme, I label it ambitious. > > Also, "getting rid of it" really means "no need to change it anymore". > I'd rather have a static complex regexp than a simple customizable one > for the sake of syntax consistency. Of course, a fixed simple regexp is > better (and no regexp at all is even better).
Fully agreed. >> Also, there is no "backward-compatibility squad", only users who care >> about what they like. > > That is what they want us to believe! :) I don't know who is "us" ;) -- Bastien
