Alan Schmitt <alan.schm...@polytechnique.org> writes: > Hello, > > I'm collaborating on a paper with some colleagues, and I convinced them > to use org-mode. I'm trying to make sure the paper is as self-contained > as possible (I don't want them to have to change their emacs > configuration file).To change the documentclass name of the exported
Maybe you can write a Makefile to change their emacs configure... > article, I added the following block in a section that is not exported: > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent :exports results > (add-to-list 'org-latex-classes > '("llncs" > "\\documentclass{llncs}" > ("\\section{%s}" . "\\section*{%s}") > ("\\subsection{%s}" . "\\subsection*{%s}") > ("\\subsubsection{%s}" . "\\subsubsection*{%s}"))) > #+end_src > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > My questions are: > - is there a way to do this without an emacs-lisp block? > - is there a nicer way to make sure that an emacs-lisp block is > evaluated upon export than ":exports results :results silent"? (If > I don't put it there, the block is not evaluated.) > - is there a way to just say the name of the documentclass without all > the boilerplate code below? In other words, can I say "this is a llncs > documentclass with the same sectioning as an article"? You should defun a classe for llncs.sty before use it. maybe you can rename llncs.sty to article.sty, and put it to directory which contain your org file. > > Thanks, > > Alan --