Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > Hello, > > Thorsten Jolitz <tjol...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I like to use rebox2 and put boxes in emails and source-file >> comment-sections, but when I use outorg on such an message-mode or elisp >> buffer and try to export it, I always get 'Args out of range' errors: > > The following line > > | org-element--parse-objects: Args out of range: 315, 316 > > is a table row in Org syntax, so it will not be exported as you expect > it to. However, it shouldn't return an error. I fixed it. > > Thank you for your report.
#+begin_src emacs-lisp (call-interactively 'org-version) #+end_src #+results: : Org-mode version 8.2.5h (release_8.2.5h-890-gdfcfca @ /usr/share/emacs/24.3/lisp/org/lisp/) ,---------------------- | lets see what happens `---------------------- ,---------- | several | important | lines | here `---------- #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results value replace (org-export-as 'ascii) #+end_src #+results: _________________ Thorsten Jolitz _________________ 1 --text follows this line-- ============================ Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > Hello, Thorsten Jolitz <tjol...@gmail.com> writes: > I like to use >rebox2 and put boxes in emails and source-file > comment-sections, >but when I use outorg on such an message-mode or elisp > buffer and >try to export it, I always get 'Args out of range' errors: The >following line | org-element--parse-objects: Args out of range: 315, >316 is a table row in Org syntax, so it will not be exported as you >expect it to. However, it shouldn't return an error. I fixed it. >Thank you for your report. ,---- | (call-interactively 'org-version) `---- ,---------------------- lets see what happens `---------------------- ,---------- several important lines here `---------- ,---- | (org-export-as 'ascii) `---- [...] -- cheers, Thorsten Almost perfect. I think the missing "|" of the reboxes in the export spoil the looks a bit, but at least they signal a difference to the exported code or example blocks, otherwise everything would look the same. Thanks for fixing. -- cheers, Thorsten