On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 03:12:14PM +0100, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > Dnia 2014-03-28, o godz. 10:59:43 > Rick Frankel <r...@rickster.com> napisał(a): > > > On 2014-03-28 10:01, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > > > Rick Frankel wrote: > > > BTW, i used "[ ]" for the unchecked box (we use the same for > > > checked and trans)... I think i'll change the unchecked box to > > > ☐ to match the checked box (same as sachua). > > > > > > Isn't it error-prone and very misleading to have 3 different states > > > in the Org files, and just 2 different in the HTML exports? > > > Wouldn't it be better to have (maybe in addition) three distinct > classes for the <li> elements with checkboxes in various states? This > would make styling them with CSS possible.
The =<li>= elements for checklists now have the class `on', `off' or `trans' depending on the state of the checkbox. Thanx for the suggestion. rick
