I should add: I'm doing this because I don't like the org-clock-display.
I have detailed this in another post, but in summary:
- It doesn't work very well with indent turned on (I have a sort of patch
for this)
- Alignment of the the numbers seems wrong
- It messes up the "..." when you fold a node
- Headlines are not editable
(I customised the font face after sending my previous email on this topic.)
Even if we manage to fix org-clock-display (and I am willing to help) I
think cookies feel very natural here also.
Not sure what to do about estimates.
On 17 April 2014 12:17, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> I don't use estimates, so I hadn't thought about that.
>
> "[01:10]" would mean I had spent 1hr 10m on this node, and all subnodes.
> Similarly, "[2d 01:10]" would mean I had spent 2d, 1hr, and 10m on this
> node, and all subnodes.
>
> I've already started hacking on this, and can share the patch if it's
> something you're interested in reviewing/integrating.
>
>
> On 17 April 2014 10:35, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Noah,
>>
>> Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> writes:
>>
>> > Would it be possible to code a similar cookie ("[:]" to be expanded
>> > into "01:10" for example) that you could update with C-c C-c, or
>> > better yet, automatically!
>>
>> Would this [01:10] cookie mean that you spent one minute on ten
>> minutes of efforts?
>>
>> The question is more to give you a chance to convince me,
>> because while I find the idea quite appealing, I think we're
>> growing a bit too fat cookie-wise.
>>
>> --
>> Bastien
>>
>
>
