Alan Schmitt <alan.schm...@polytechnique.org> writes: > Hi Nicolas, > > I've changed all of these, and I will keep testing it over the next few > days. I have one question remaining, though. > > On 2014-04-25 08:51, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > >>> (if (time-less-p nt (current-time)) nt))))) >> >> This is a matter of taste, but I find one-armed `if' a bit confusing. >> Since return value matters, I suggest to use >> >> (and (time-less-p nt (current-time)) nt) > > Why not use "(when (time-less-p nt (current-time)) nt)" instead of "and" > here?
the answer is in the quote already: ,--------------------------------------------- | Since return value matters, I suggest to use ... `--------------------------------------------- -- cheers, Thorsten
