Hi Bastien,

Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes:
> Albert Krewinkel <tar...@moltkeplatz.de> writes:
>
>> * org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Use `org-any-link-re' to avoid
>>   code duplication.
>
> This is not really code duplication, as the output of `org-any-link-re'
> is different from the output of the current sexp in the code.

I'm not exactly sure what you mean, are you referring to the variables'
different representation in the source?  I double checked that

(string-equal re org-any-link-re) => t

when `re' is set to the old value (as of commit 7c8559e).

> That said, the change looks good anyway.  Can you double-check there
> cannot be any problem with the value of `org-any-link-re'?

The variable is only ever changed when calling `org-make-link-regexps',
so I'm quite positive that the change does not have any unintended side
effects.  The test suite passes, too.

>> This is a TINYCHANGE.
>
> (TINYCHANGE should stand alone on the line.)

Done.  As an aside: I did sign the copyright assignment papers to be
able to contrivute to Gnus, but that probably wouldn't help much, as
Org is a different project.  Is that correct?

> Thanks!

No, thank you all for all the work you put into this!  It is truly
amazing!

Albert Krewinkel (1):
  org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Reuse global variable

 lisp/org.el | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
2.0.0.rc0


Reply via email to