I'm getting an error on HEAD now:
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function org-add-props)
(org-add-props "WARNING: No org-loaddefs.el file could be found from
where org.el is loaded." nil (quote face) (quote org-warning))
(message (org-add-props "WARNING: No org-loaddefs.el file could be found
from where org.el is loaded." nil (quote face) (quote org-warning)))
(condition-case nil (load (concat (file-name-directory load-file-name)
"org-loaddefs.el") nil t t t) (error (message (org-add-props "WARNING: No
org-loaddefs.el file could be found from where org.el is loaded." nil (qu$
(or (equal this-command (quote eval-buffer)) (condition-case nil (load
(concat (file-name-directory load-file-name) "org-loaddefs.el") nil t t t)
(error (message (org-add-props "WARNING: No org-loaddefs.el file could b$
eval-buffer(#<buffer *load*-416952> nil
"/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/vendor/org-mode/lisp/org.el" nil t) ; Reading at
buffer position 3681
load-with-code-conversion("/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/vendor/org-mode/lisp/org.el"
"/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/vendor/org-mode/lisp/org.el" nil t)
require(org)
eval-buffer(#<buffer *load*-693116> nil
"/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/lisp/init-org.el" nil t) ; Reading at buffer
position 127
load-with-code-conversion("/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/lisp/init-org.el"
"/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/lisp/init-org.el" nil t)
require(init-org)
eval-buffer(#<buffer *load*> nil "/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/init.el" nil
t) ; Reading at buffer position 2043
load-with-code-conversion("/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/init.el"
"/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/init.el" t t)
load("/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/init" t t)
#[0 "^H\205\262^@ \306=\203^Q^@\307^H\310Q\202;^@
\311=\204^^^@\307^H\312Q\202;^@\313\307\314\315#\203*^@\316\202;^@\313\307\314\317#\203:^@\320\nB^R\321\202;^@\316\322^S\323^A\322\211#\210^K\322=\203a^@\324\325\32$
command-line()
normal-top-level()
On 30 May 2014 14:15, Bastien <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
> Noah Slater <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > That's pretty cool. Any reason it doesn't use the same syntax as the
> > :tstart param though?
>
> I first want to see if the new feature is useful before adding up more
> subfeatures. So let's wait until 8.3 is released and see if (more)
> people want more flexibility here. In the meantime, I think it makes
> sense to offer the predefined ranges that we can use in org clock
> tables.
>
> > This breaks a function I had written (and perhaps other people's
> > functions).
>
> This is now fixed, thanks,
>
> --
> Bastien
>
