2014-06-08 15:07 GMT+02:00 Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com>: > Nick Dokos <ndo...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Cecil Westerhof <cldwester...@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> At the moment I am using the following formula: > >> #+TBLFM: @<<$4..@>>$4 = $2 - $3 :: @>$2=vsum(@<<$2..@>>$2) :: > >> @>$3=vsum(@<<$3..@>>$3) :: @>$4=vsum(@<<$4..@>>$4) > >> > >> This does what I want, but there are two things that could be improved. > >> > >> - The second, third and fourth formula do exactly the same, only on > >> different columns. Could this be rewritten to one formula? > >> > > > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > > #+TBLFM: @<<$4..@>>$4 = $2 - $3 :: @>$2..$4=vsum(@<<$0..@>>$0) > > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > > > See (info "(org) References") > > > >> - The line becomes long and hard to evaluate for a person. Is there > >> a possibility to put the formulas below each-other? > >> > > > > I don't believe so but my belief may be out of date. It has been > > discussed before: check the list archives. > > Sort of but not really. See "Using multiple #+TBLFM lines" in the > manual. >
That I found. Is handy, but only for debugging. But with the shortened formula line, it is less of a problem. -- Cecil Westerhof
