Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> I also ran across this need. What I had in mind was that certain todo > >> types would be treated as inline. >> For instance, if "P" was a member of this hypothetical >> org-inline-todo-keywords, then >> >> * P a paragraph >> some contents >> >> would be rendered as >> >> some contents >> >> by the exporter, no matter the backend. >> >> Such a feature is more generic and would be useful in other contexts ; >> and the LaTeX-related issues discussed in this thread would be solved >> using something like >> >> * INLINE appendix >> \appendix >> * Appendix 1 >> > > Why TODO types rather than a tag? IMO using a TODO type would conflate > task management and document structuring. What do you think about the > attached patch which should add this functionality to the core.
I would be happy to see this change in core, as I use ignoreheading-like tags all of the time. On the other hand it's not particularly elegant, but it's already in ox-beamer.el, so that's probably OK. Thanks, Rasmus -- Er du tosset for noge' lårt!
