Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com> writes:
> Should this be done personally or in master?
I can't think of a case where it could lead to confusion, so I'd say it
can go in master, at least until someone complains, if ever.
BTW, as a reminder, I'm all for thinking again how emphasis/verbatim
markup is defined in Org but I doubt changing it by small touches will
do any good. IMO, it needs to be discussed as a whole.
I think a good markup should
- not need to be customizable,
- allow any number of (non-consecutive) newline characters,
- allow escaping markup in verbatim objects.
For example, much like radio links, bold object could be defined as
1. anything but an alphanumeric character (including nothing),
2. / character,
3. an alphanumeric character,
4. anything excepted 2 or more consecutive newline characters
(non-greedy),
5. an alphanumeric character,
6. / character,
7. anything but an alphanumeric character (including nothing).
For simplicity, I ignore the special case /a/ for the moment.
The verbatim would be the same, with a slight change in 4th element:
4. the same, with \= treated as =
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
