Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > Andreas Leha <andreas.l...@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes: > >> Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > >>> No matter how special the results drawer is, it cannot (and shouldn't) >>> contain headlines. >> >> You are the master of the parser... > > That's why I carefully avoid shooting myself in the foot. There is (at > least) a good reason why only headlines can contain headlines, which is > speed, as a consequence of CFG. > >> IIUC, you are saying that raw+replace is possible right now for any >> content in the results (other than headlines), if the results are in a >> drawer? > > If the results are in a drawer, this is not "raw" anymore, but "drawer". > Anyway you can put anything in your drawer besides a headline and > another drawer.
But then, I do not understand your statement 'headlines are the only limitation to raw+replace behaviour'. This code block does not seem to respect 'raw+replace' for me: #+name: dtrn #+BEGIN_SRC R :results raw replace nwords <- 500 nletters <- sapply(1:nwords, function(i) sample(1:10, 1)) words <- sapply(nletters, function(i) paste(sample(letters, i), collapse="")) words[sample(nwords, 100)] <- "\n" paste(words, collapse=" ") #+END_SRC > >> Then, my follow-up question is simply, why are drawers not the default >> for results, then? Is there any drawback (apart from an additional >> line)? > > The block may insert a headline, or another drawer, within the results > drawer, thus breaking the document. > I understand that. Will update my local 'defaults' then to drawer. Regards, Andreas
