Achim Gratz <[email protected]> writes: > I think that "^[ \t]*\\(\\(?:#\\+\\|:\\)CATEGORY:\\)\\(.*\\)" would be a > better regex, assuming that the original regex was doing the right thing.
Applied, thanks, -- Bastien
Achim Gratz <[email protected]> writes: > I think that "^[ \t]*\\(\\(?:#\\+\\|:\\)CATEGORY:\\)\\(.*\\)" would be a > better regex, assuming that the original regex was doing the right thing.
Applied, thanks, -- Bastien