Le 13/08/2014 22:58, Ernesto Durante a écrit :
> Thank you Thierry for your answer and all the details. I really want to be a
> contributor
> and help ob-C to improve (as well as can do a modest lisper).
Any help is welcome !
> I tried to find a way to master Cx11 and babel is helping me a lot.
> I think babel can really accelerate learning and dissimation of C++.
>
> In this perspective, I have another very simple idea that I want to share
> with you. I find C++ too noisy.
Yes, indeed.
> In the following piece of code
> I really find the presence of the main call and the return statement really
> annoying and useless.
>
> #+begin_src C++ :includes '(<iostream> <cassert>) :results silent
> template <typename T1, typename T2>
> auto compose(T1 t1, T2 t2) -> decltype(t1 + t2) { return t1+t2; }
>
> int main() {
> auto d=compose(std::string("ola"),std::string("ciao")); //d's type is
> std::string
> auto i=compose(4,2);
> assert(d== std::string("olaciao") && i==6);
> return 0
> }
> #+end_src
>
> We can remove it by letting ob-C do the work by modifying the function
> org-babel-C-ensure-main-wrap. Now the code looks (according to me) easier to
> read
>
> #+begin_src C++ :includes '(<iostream> <cassert>) :results silent
> template <typename T1, typename T2>
> auto compose(T1 t1, T2 t2) -> decltype(t1 + t2) { return t1+t2; }
>
> template <>
> int compose(int t1,int t2) { return t1+t2; }
>
> ////main////
> auto d=compose(std::string("ola"),std::string("ciao")); //d's type is
> std::string
> auto i=compose(4,2);
> assert(d== std::string("olaciao") && i==6);
> #+end_src
>
> What do you think ?
>
>
Well... In this example, we go down from 9 lines to 7 lines. Ok fair.
But the price is a new syntax to learn:
////main////
Is it wise to add an org-mode specific syntax to C++ (which already has
a lot) ?
Being noisy is a weakness of C++.
I think it is not the responsibility of org-mode to fix that.
Now, org-mode is already able to process main()-less blocks in simple cases.
#+BEGIN_SRC C++
printf("hello\n");
#+END_SRC
If we can find a way to extend this feature to more cases,
without needing a long documentation,
then, sure, it would be a nice improvement.
Regards
Thierry
