Hello, Thorsten Jolitz <tjol...@gmail.com> writes:
> Ok, thanks, that sounds promising. OTOH, is the use of "\\S-" really > mandatory, No, it isn't. > couldn't a more robust construct be used, either something > like this (untested) regexp: > > ,---- > | "[^[:space:]\\n]+" > `---- AFAIK, [:space:] is not compatible with XEmacs. It could be "[^ \r\t\n]+", but even this could be too broad (e.g., "#+BEGIN_..."). We could also limit block names to alphanumeric characters and a bunch of symbols. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
